e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function

    Russell, Sophie L. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3924-3435, Rahman, Mushidur ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-8088, Steward, Charles J. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5405-4608, Harwood, Amy E ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5745-2564, McGregor, Gordon ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8963-9107, Banerjee, Prithwish ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7793-1733, Okwose, Nduka C. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-2538 and Jakovljevic, Djordje G. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2686-6542 (2024) Central Pulse Wave Velocity and Augmentation Index Are Repeatable and Reproducible Measures of Arterial Function. Health Science Reports, 7 (11). e70155. ISSN 2398-8835

    [img]
    Preview
    Published Version
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

    Download (538kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Background and Aims: Arterial function (specifically arterial stiffness) is an important cardiovascular risk factor. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (Al x $x$ ) are established indicators of arterial function. The present study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of PWV and Al x $x$ in healthy individuals. Methods: Forty healthy participants (age 33 ± 11 years, 17 females) underwent resting supine PWV and Al x $x$ assessments. Measurements were made in triplicate and repeated 1 week apart. Al x $x$ was measured by brachial occlusion and PWV was measured from the carotid artery to the femoral artery via the tonometer‐oscillometric method. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Interoperator reproducibility was performed on 10 participants. Results: The average values for week‐to‐week visits for PWV and Al x $x$ were 6.20 ± 0.91 versus 6.13 ± 0.91 ms−1 and 14.0 ± 11.8 versus 16.3 ± 12.2% respectively. For same‐day measurements, both PWV and Al x $x$ showed excellent repeatability (PWV: ICC = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.98, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.84–0.94, p < 0.01) and interoperator reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.93–1.00, p < 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.69–0.98, p < 0.01). Measurements were repeated 1 week apart and showed good reproducibility (PWV: ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.87, p ≤ 0.01; Al x $x$ : ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.73–0.86, p < 0.01). Conclusion: PWV and Al x $x$ demonstrate excellent repeatability and good reproducibility. Considering these variables are noninvasive and easy‐to‐measure, arterial function assessment may have a role in routine clinical practice to facilitate risk stratification in cardiovascular diseases.

    Impact and Reach

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    4Downloads
    6 month trend
    14Hits

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

    Altmetric

    Repository staff only

    Edit record Edit record