Events, turns, and critical junctures: unpacking the temporality of supporter rights and democracy in English football

Turner, Mark ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8029-1703 and Fitzpatrick, Daniel (2024) Events, turns, and critical junctures: unpacking the temporality of supporter rights and democracy in English football. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics. pp. 1-16. ISSN 1940-6940

Preview

Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (683kB) | Preview

Abstract

The future of professional men’s football in England stands at a critical juncture. In the wake of a global pandemic, the national game has been beset by volatility and upheaval. In April 2021, six of the most storied clubs in England announced they would be joining a new breakaway European Super League (ESL). These proposals triggered vehement opposition from fan movements, catalysing the intervention of the UK government who established a fan-led review of football governance (FLR) to consult fans on future regulatory reform and the security and safety of supporters at major events. Emerging out of these exogenous shocks and endogenous change, the governance of English football is set to be radically transformed via the establishment of a new regulatory regime. In this article, we employ eventful sociology and historical institutionalism to operationalise the concept of critical juncture and apply this through an analysis of two temporal periods (1985-1990) and (2020-2024). In doing so, we show how the current ‘regulatory turn’ is interdependently linked to prior historical transformative events, namely the Heysel and Hillsborough stadium disasters and the subsequent neoliberal transformation of English football across the last four decades. Incorporating a more nuanced understanding of change and continuity in the governance of English football, we argue that new regulatory frameworks, despite their transformative potential, may continue to exhibit institutional legacies of the existing regime and prevailing political economy.