Between Optimism and Anti-Optimism: Prémontval’s “Middle Point"

Strickland, Lloyd ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2560-6909 (2024) Between Optimism and Anti-Optimism: Prémontval’s “Middle Point". In: Debates, Controversies, and Prizes: philosophy in the German Enlightenment. Bloomsbury Studies in Modern German Philosophy . Bloomsbury, pp. 69-88. ISBN 9781350348646 (hardback); 9781350348677 (online)

Accepted Version File will be available on: 25 January 2025. Available under License In Copyright. Download (275kB)

Abstract

In 1753, the Berlin Academy announced that the focus of the prize essay contest of 1755 would be optimism, with entrants required (among other things) ‘to put forward arguments that will be thought most fitting to confirm or destroy this system’. In line with these instructions, entrants submitted essays that were either pro- or anti-optimism. This was to the dismay of one of the judges of the contest, André-Pierre Le Guay de Prémontval (1716–1764), who had, by his own admission, surreptitiously attempted to influence the entrants by sketching out a ‘middle point’ between the polarized pro- and anti-optimist positions in a series of books published between 1754 and 1755, namely Thoughts on Freedom, The Diogenes of d’Alembert, and On Chance under the Rule of Providence. The aim of this essay is to elucidate and historically contextualize Prémontval’s highly original ‘middle point’, as outlined implicitly in the aforementioned books and much more explicitly in a series of essays published after the essay contest had concluded.