Associations of bone mineral density-related genes and marathon performance in elite European Caucasian marathon runners.

Herbert, AJ, Williams, AG, Lockey, SJ, Erskine, RM, Hennis, PJ, Sale, C, Day, SH and Stebbings, GK (2017) Associations of bone mineral density-related genes and marathon performance in elite European Caucasian marathon runners. In: International Sports Science and Sports Medicine Conference (ISSMC), 05 September 2017 - 07 September 2017, Newcastle University.

Preview

Available under License In Copyright. Download (136kB) | Preview

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) is a multi-factorial phenotype determined by factors such as physical activity, diet and a sizeable genetic component. Athletic populations tend to possess higher BMD than non-athletes due to a larger volume of exercise completed. Despite this, some endurance runners can possess low BMD and/or suffer stress fractures, which can have negative impacts on their health and performance. Therefore, we hypothesised that elite endurance runners would possess a genotype associated with enhanced BMD and a reduced risk of injury, resulting in less training interruption and greater potential success. The study compared the genotype and allele frequencies of 5 genetic variants associated with BMD (LRP5 rs3736228, TNFRSF11B rs4355801, VDR rs2228570, WNT16 rs3801387, AXIN1 rs9921222) in elite (men < 2 h 30 min, n = 110; women < 3 h 00 min, n = 98) and sub-elite (men 2 h 30 min – 2 h 45 min, n = 181; women 3 h 00 min – 3 h 15 min, n = 67) marathon runners with those of a non-athlete control population (n = 474). We also investigated whether marathon personal best time was associated with a more “advantageous” BMD genotype. Congruent with our hypothesis, the “risk” T allele for the AXIN1 rs9921222 polymorphism was 5% more frequent in the control group than in sub-elites (P = 0.030, χ2 = 4.69) but no further differences were observed for this variant (P ≥ 0.083, χ2 ≤ 4.98). WNT16 rs3801387 genotype frequency differed between athletes and controls (P = 0.002, χ2 = 12.02) and elites vs controls (P = 0.008, χ2 = 9.72), as did allele frequency. However, contrary to our hypothesis, it was the “risk” A allele that was ~5% more frequent in athletes than controls. Similarly, when combining data from all 5 variants, the athletes had a lower Total Genotype Score than controls (53.6 vs 65.7; P ≤ 0.001), again suggesting greater genetic susceptibility to bone injury in athletes. Personal best times were not associated with genotype in any comparison. These results suggest that high-level endurance runners do not benefit from genetic resistance to bone injury and a resulting ability to sustain large training volumes, contradicting our hypothesis. High-level endurance runners appear to be at a higher risk of bone injury from a genetic perspective, for as yet unexplained reasons, although large inter-individual differences in genetic risk exist.