Arguments at cross purposes: moral epistemology and medical ethics

Loughlin, Michael (2002) Arguments at cross purposes: moral epistemology and medical ethics. Journal of medical ethics, 28 (1). pp. 28-32. ISSN 0306-6800

File not available for download.

Abstract

Different beliefs about the nature and justification of bioethics may reflect different assumptions in moral epistemology. Two alternative views (put forward by David Seedhouse and Michael H Kottow) are analysed and some speculative conclusions formed. The foundational questions raised here are by no means settled and deserve further attention.

Item Type:	Article
Peer-reviewed:	No
Date Deposited:	18 Jun 2009 15:31
Publisher:	BMJ Group
Additional Information:	Full-text of this article is not available in this e-prints service. This article was originally published [following peer-review] in Journal of Medical Ethics, published by and copyright BMJ Group.
Divisions:
URI:	https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/70884
DOI:	https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.1.28
ISSN	0306-6800

Impact and Reach

Statistics

DownloadsShow export options

Activity Overview

6 month trend

0Downloads

6 month trend

364Hits

Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

Altmetric

Repository staff only

Edit record