Response to Philip J. Senter on arguments for Behemoth as a dinosaur

Mckee, Samuel ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1813-0521 (2025) Response to Philip J. Senter on arguments for Behemoth as a dinosaur. Science and Christian Belief, 37 (1). pp. 84-86. ISSN 0954-4194

Published Version
File will be available on: 11 March 2026.
Available under License In Copyright.
Download (303kB)

Official URL: https://scienceandchristianbelief.org/issue/?issue...

Abstract

Senter makes a convincing case against Behemoth being a dinosaur in Job 40. He also deals with arguments for Leviathan and where elsewhere theologians have sought to categorise dinosaurs in scripture. I argue that, from the perspective of philosophy of science, we cannot conceive of dinosaurs in scripture seriously and it is time to lay the debate to rest for reasons other than translation.

Item Type:	Article (Letter)
Peer-reviewed:	Yes
Date Deposited:	12 Mar 2025 13:19
Publisher:	Christians in Science and Faith And Thought
Additional Information:	This article has been accepted for publication in Science and Christian Belief 37 (1) April 2025 published by Christians in Science and Faith And Thought.
Divisions:	Faculties > Arts and Humanities
Subject terms:	2204 Religion and Religious Studies, 5004 Religious studies, 5005 Theology
URI:	https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/638991
ISSN	0954-4194
e-ISSN	2756-0988

Impact and Reach

Statistics

DownloadsShow export options

Activity Overview

6 month trend

1Download

6 month trend

9Hits

Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

Repository staff only

Edit record