Cutting technique modification: a way to improve movement quality and develop agility in youth?

Thieschäfer, Lutz ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6988-1040, Dos'Santos, Thomas ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2715-0116 and Bsch, Dirk (2024) Cutting technique modification: a way to improve movement quality and develop agility in youth? Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 38 (9). pp. 1596-1606. ISSN 1064-8011

Accepted Version File will be available on: 23 July 2025. Available under License In Copyright. Download (552kB)

Abstract

Certain sidestep techniques and kinematics are characteristic of high movement quality and are associated with both, faster performance and lower knee joint loading (i.e., reduced anterior cruciate ligament injury risk). The aim of this study was to determine the effects of a 6-week, side step, technique modification training intervention targeting specific kinematics on agility performance and movement quality. Twenty-two adolescent American football players were recruited for a nonrandomized, controlled, intervention study. For 6 weeks, an intervention group (IG) of 11 players participated in 25-minute cutting technique training sessions integrated into team training twice a week, whereas a control group (CG) of 11 players continued their usual training routine. Agility performance was assessed based on percentage-based change of direction deficit (CODDp) obtained during reactive agility tests at 45° and 90° angles. The Cutting Movement Assessment Score (CMAS) qualitative screening tool was used to assess 2D high-speed videos of the cuts for movement quality. The significance level was set at α = 0.01. The intervention effectively altered players' sidestep technique irrespective of cutting angle with large time × group interaction effects observed for CMAS (<FOR VERIFICATION>ηp2 = 0.82). Statistical and practical significant improvements in CMAS pre-to-post intervention were evident in the IG (-2.30 ≤ g ≤ -1.75; 313.87 ≤ BF10 ≤ 2,342.00), whereas deteriorations were found in the CG for 90° (g = 1.38; BF10 = 64.21). However, in both groups, no statistically significant differences in CODDp were observed pre-to-post intervention (0.019 ≤ p ≤ 0.586; 0.34 ≤ BF10 ≤ 3.59). The cutting technique modification training meaningfully improved movement quality, without negatively affecting agility performance, and can be used by practitioners to foster a safe technical foundation for subsequent agility development in adolescent athletes.