Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: a systematic review

Smith, Andrew, Roberts, Anton, Krzemieniewska‐Nandwani, Karolina, Eggins, Liz, Cook, Will ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3833-9256, Fox, Chris ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1931-2058, Maruna, Shadd, Wallace, Stephanie and Szifris, Kirstine (2024) Revisiting the effectiveness of cognitive‐behavioural therapy for reducing reoffending in the criminal justice system: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 20 (3). e1425. ISSN 1891-1803

Preview

Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows. The proposed systematic review is an update to, and extension of, Lipsey et al. (2007). As such we build on their previous aims to: (i) Assess and synthesise the overall impact of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) on offender recidivism; (ii) Examine possible sources of variability in the effectiveness of CBT. Data permitting, we will examine if the effectiveness of CBT varies by: (a) Characteristics of the CBT intervention (e.g., cognitive restructuring vs. cognitive skills training, group v. individual implementation; and/or custodial v. community setting, and/or), (b) Characteristics of the population (e.g., juveniles vs. adult offenders), (c) Implementation factors (e.g., implementing practitioner, use of structured/manualised approaches, delivery mode, and/or programme duration or intensity), (d) Evaluation methods (e.g., randomised vs. non-randomised research designs); (iv) Determine whether there is a decline in the effect of CBT on recidivism over time; and (v) Investigate whether there is an interaction between implementation factors and time in terms of the effect on recidivism.