The relationship between individual and composite FMS™ score with the anthropometric and physical characteristics of elite Touch (rugby) players

Thorpe, Cari ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9673-062X, Dobbin, Nick ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-1683, Twist, Craig and Callaghan, Michael ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3540-2838 (2024) The relationship between individual and composite FMS™ score with the anthropometric and physical characteristics of elite Touch (rugby) players. Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise. ISSN 2096-6709 (In Press)

Accepted Version File not available for download. Download (482kB)

Abstract

Purpose 1). To describe and compare the movement patterns, anthropometric and physical characteristics of male and female Touch players; and 2). to examine the relationships between Functional Movement Screening (FMS™) scores and the anthropometric and physical characteristics. Methods This was a cross-sectional study with 35 elite Touch players (18 males, age=24.7±4.9 y and 17 females, age=26.7±5.2 y). Anthropometric (stature, body mass) and physical characteristics (sprint times, glycolytic change-of-direction test, and countermovement jump (CMJ) flight time and peak power) were assessed alongside movement patterns using the FMS™ battery. Data were analysed for between-sex differences (independent t-test, Mann Whitney U) and associations (Spearman’s correlation coefficient). Results Between-sex differences in body mass (t=6.082, p<0.001), stature (t=9.247, p<0.001), CMJ flight time (t=3.576, p=0.001), relative CMJ peak power (t=6.578, p<0.001), 10 m sprint time (t=15.861, p<0.001), glycolytic change of direction test time (t=-11.831, p<0.001) and Yo-Yo IR1 (t=6.842, p<0.001) were observed. There was minimal differences for deep squat (Z=-1.036, p=0.443), in-line lunge (Z=-1.284, p=0.303), shoulder mobility (Z=-0.173, p=0.883), trunk stability push-up (Z=-0.896, p=0.483) and rotary stability (Z=-1.537, p=0.273). The correlation between total and individual FMSTM scores with anthropometric and physical characteristics ranged from trivial-to-moderate (r=-0.502 to 0.488). Conclusion The lack of difference for the FMS™ composite score and small-to-trivial differences in individual scores allows a comparison between mixed populations within Touch. Whilst many of the correlations were trivial-to-small, there were differences between sexes in the associations and evidence that improvements in functional deficiencies could translate into improved physical performance.