When open data closes the door: a critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals

Prosser, Annayah M B ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2381-9556, Hamshaw, Richard J T ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7671-7217, Meyer, Johanna ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1447-7200, Bagnall, Ralph ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8676-5394, Blackwood, Leda ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3817-129X, Huysamen, Monique ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5664-998X, Jordan, Abbie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1595-5574, Vasileiou, Konstantina ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5047-3920 and Walter, Zoe ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8310-4021 (2023) When open data closes the door: a critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62 (4). pp. 1635-1653. ISSN 0144-6665

Preview

Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (484kB) | Preview

Abstract

Opening data promises to improve research rigour and democratize knowledge production. But it also presents practical, theoretical, and ethical considerations for qualitative researchers in particular. Discussion about open data in qualitative social psychology predates the replication crisis. However, the nuances of this ongoing discussion have not been translated into current journal guidelines on open data. In this article, we summarize ongoing debates about open data from qualitative perspectives, and through a content analysis of 261 journals we establish the state of current journal policies for open data in the domain of social psychology. We critically discuss how current common expectations for open data may not be adequate for establishing qualitative rigour, can introduce ethical challenges, and may place those who wish to use qualitative approaches at a disadvantage in peer review and publication processes. We advise that future open data guidelines should aim to reflect the nuance of arguments surrounding data sharing in qualitative research, and move away from a universal “one-size-fits-all” approach to data sharing. This article outlines the past, present, and the potential future of open data guidelines in social-psychological journals. We conclude by offering recommendations for how journals might more inclusively consider the use of open data in qualitative methods, whilst recognizing and allowing space for the diverse perspectives, needs, and contexts of all forms of social-psychological research.