e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    In participatory budgeting we trust? Fairness, tactics and (in)accessibility in participatory governance

    Wilkinson, Catherine, Briggs, Jo ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4041-1918, Salt, Karen, Vines, John and Flynn, Emma (2019) In participatory budgeting we trust? Fairness, tactics and (in)accessibility in participatory governance. Local Government Studies, 45 (6). pp. 1001-1020. ISSN 0300-3930

    [img]
    Preview
    Accepted Version
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

    Download (226kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Participatory budgeting (PB) is a significant innovation in democracy and local development. PB provides the opportunity for citizens to engage in processes of deliberation and decision-making upon the allocation of public funds. As new critical discourse emerges surrounding this model of local government spending, a significant area warranting investigation concerns how trust, and indeed mistrust, factor into PB. Through an analysis of interviews with residents and Council staff engaged in PB processes in a county in the north of England, we highlight the ways in which issues of trust can impact on participation in these initiatives, and also strengthen relationships between voting delegates, project teams and local government. This paper argues that increasing the perceived accessibility, and reconsidering the inclusion of mass membership groups in PB, might help to create progressive, effective and trustful participation.

    Impact and Reach

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    208Downloads
    6 month trend
    59Hits

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

    Altmetric

    Repository staff only

    Edit record Edit record