Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    Questions in English and French research articles in linguistics: a corpus-based contrastive analysis

    Curry, Niall ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4471-6794 and Chambers, Angela (2017) Questions in English and French research articles in linguistics: a corpus-based contrastive analysis. Corpus Pragmatics, 1 (4). pp. 327-350. ISSN 2509-9507

    Accepted Version
    Download (602kB) | Preview


    Although research on evaluation in academic writing has profited from developments in contrastive linguistics since the late 1980s, very little empirical research has been conducted with respect to questions in contrastive studies. The aim of this study is to investigate the functions of questions as a means of reader engagement in academic research articles in English and French in the discipline of linguistics. To do this, a corpus-based contrastive analysis of two subcorpora of KIAP (Fløttum et al. in Academic voices across languages and disciplines, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, 2006) is conducted. The English and French subcorpora are assessed using Hyland’s model of stance and reader engagement in terms of questions and their seven functions as evaluative markers of reader engagement (Text 22(4):529–557, 2002; Discourse Stud 7(2):173–192, 2005b), including their form and distribution within the text. This analysis focuses on two particular functions of questions, namely ‘framing the discourse’ and ‘organising the text’. The results suggest that, although there is some degree of homogeneity in the use of questions in terms of function, form and distribution, there is also evidence of important differences between the two languages. These findings illustrate some distinctions in writing in these two discourse communities and their potential for informing language pedagogy in both English for academic purposes and Français langue académique.

    Impact and Reach


    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    6 month trend

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.


    Repository staff only

    Edit record Edit record