e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    Repeatability of a bending stiffness test for snowboarding wrist protectors

    Leslie, G ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6411-1808, Winwood, K ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8696-9976, Wang, W ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1225-4011, Hamilton, N and Allen, T ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4910-9149 (2023) Repeatability of a bending stiffness test for snowboarding wrist protectors. Sports Engineering, 26 (1). 6. ISSN 1369-7072

    [img]
    Preview
    Published Version
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

    Download (922kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Snowboarding wrist protectors are typically designed to limit impact forces and prevent wrist hyperextension. The standard for snowboarding wrist protectors (ISO 20320:2020) includes a test for measuring their bending stiffness, when fitted to a wrist surrogate. This test serves as a simple means of assessing the ability of wrist protectors to prevent wrist hyperextension. Wrist protector bending stiffness measurements have been shown to be influenced by surrogate design, protector strapping condition, and surrogate surface compliance. Currently, there is a lack of knowledge on the repeatability of bending stiffness measurements, as previous studies have conducted tests during one session. This study investigated the repeatability of a bending stiffness test, by testing two snowboarding wrist protectors (short and long) on two wrist surrogates (compliant and stiff), under three protector strapping conditions (loose, moderate, tight), across three repeated test sessions. Test session had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on torque values, with a large effect size (ηp2 > 0.14), indicating the test had limited repeatability between test sessions. Despite this limited repeatability, torque values increased with both wrist angle and strap tightness, as reported before, indicating consistent trends in results. The outer surface compliance of the surrogate did not significantly affect the protector’s sensitivity to test session nor strapping condition.

    Impact and Reach

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    215Downloads
    6 month trend
    70Hits

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

    Altmetric

    Repository staff only

    Edit record Edit record