Greenhalgh, Olivia (2023) The development of clinical interventions for knee injury management, using a novel cooling, heating, and compression device. Doctoral thesis (PhD), Manchester Metropolitan University in collaboration with the University of Central Lancashire.
|
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: Cryotherapy and compression are advised within guidelines for injury management. However, optimum methods of applying cryotherapy have not been defined and authors have advocated a ‘personalised’ intervention approach. With a novel cooling, heating, and compression device (CHCD) offering control of temperature and compression, it is possible to explore the effect of a range of interventions for knee injury management. Methods & Results: Study 1 explored four 20-minute CHCD interventions on skin surface temperature (Tsk), oxygenation, thermal sensation/comfort, muscle strength, pressure pain threshold (PPT) and joint position sense (JPS), in a randomised crossover design on 26 healthy male subjects. The four interventions were: 1) 10 °C & 50 mmHg 2) 15 °C & 50 mmHg 3) 10 °C & 32 mmHg 4) alternating 10-40 °C & 25-50 mmHg. Interventions set at 10 °C achieved Tsk within the therapeutic range. Despite no significant differences in Tsk between the two compression settings, intervention 1 was perceived to be the coldest. Study 2 investigated the effects of two 20-minute interventions, A) wetted ice and B) CHCD (10 °C & 50 mmHg), on quadriceps strength, PPT, JPS and participant-perceived pain, in 10 healthy participants with experimentally induced knee pain. Complete pain relief (≥93% reduction) was achieved immediately post-cooling in 7 participants for the CHCD and in 4 participants for ice. Significant increases in PPT were found following the CHCD, up to 20-minutes post-cooling. Ice reduced strength by 13% immediately post-cooling, however the CHCD had a negligible effect on strength post-cooling (+0.3%). Significant increases were found in range of motion in the coronal plane following ice, indicating increased instability. Study 3 investigated the effects of A) wetted ice and B) CHCD (10 °C & 50 mmHg), on participant-reported pain, swelling and stability, through a series of 11 single-case experiments, using an alternating treatment design. The CHCD intervention achieved clinically important changes more frequently than the ice intervention for patient-reported pain (by 9%), swelling (by 21%) and patient-reported stability (by 3%). Conclusion: Compressive cryotherapy using the CHCD at 10 °C with 50 mmHg, appeared more beneficial for the majority (82%) of individuals with knee injuries, for reducing swelling and pain, compared to ice. Targeted compressive cryotherapy, using the novel CHCD, may contribute to greater clinical management of knee injuries.
Impact and Reach
Statistics
Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.