Spatial disparity and structural inequality in disability patterns across Tianjin municipality: a multiple deprivation perspective

Qiu, Ning, Cheng, Jianquan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9778-9009 and Zhang, Tianjie (2022) Spatial disparity and structural inequality in disability patterns across Tianjin municipality: a multiple deprivation perspective. Habitat International, 130. p. 102685. ISSN 0197-3975

Preview

Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (11MB) | Preview

Abstract

Reducing the spatial disparities and structural inequalities faced by disabled people is a global challenge in both developed and developing countries that requires an understanding of disability-driven deprivation. This study aims to develop and validate a conceptual framework for analysing the structural inequality and spatial disparity of disability-related deprivation. To achieve this goal, an Index of Disability-Related Multiple Deprivation (IDMD) based on six specific domains, including employment, education, marital status, health, services and barrier-free environments, is proposed. The IDMD was calculated at the sub-district level within the Tianjin municipality using aggregated registration information from the Tianjin Disability Database in 2020. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to assign the weight of each indicator of IDMD. Moran I and LISA analysis were used to quantify the spatial disparity of IDMD across the municipality. Multi-Scale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR) was used to model the structural factors shaping the spatial disparity of disability-related deprivation in terms of gender, age, and disability types. Three key findings have been generated as follows. The spatial variability of IDMD revealed significant urban-rural disparity across the municipality, highlighting the difficulties faced by vulnerable and disadvantaged disabled people in rural areas. Men, working age groups and those with intellectual disability contributed most to the structural inequalities of IDMD. Thirdly, the location of greatest deprivation varied for different groups; working age groups faced the highest levels of deprivation in the urban centre, males faced the most deprivation in the urban fringe and those with intellectual, limb, visual, speech or mental disabilities were most deprived in rural areas. These findings reflect the complexity of structural factors affecting disability-related deprivation at the municipality scale. This study points to the need for informed, targeted welfare facilities planning and management strategies to improve spatial equity and social justice for disabled people.