e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise – a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?)

    Hartley, Samantha, Baker, Charley, Birtwhistle, Michael, Burgess, Jennifer L, Chatburn, Eleanor, Cobbaert, Laurence, Howley, Maddie, Huggett, Charlotte, MacKenzie-Nash, Charlie, Newton, Alice, Parry, Sarah ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5666-1997, Smith, Jee, Taylor, Christopher DJ, Taylor, Peter James and Timoclea, Robyn (2022) Commentary: Bringing together lived experience, clinical and research expertise – a commentary on the May 2022 debate (should CAMH professionals be diagnosing personality disorder in adolescence?). Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 27 (3). pp. 246-249. ISSN 1475-357X

    [img]
    Preview
    Published Version
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

    Download (150kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Background: There is a wealth of evidence to suggest that the Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD, or similar Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, EUPD) construct is harmful. We provide a commentary on the ideas expressed in the May Debate issue, highlighting both concerns and alternatives. Method: We bring together lived experience, clinical, and research expertise. This commentary was written collaboratively drawing on all these sources of evidence. Results: We outline evidence that the BPD construct is invalid, harmful, not necessary for effective treatment and a potential block to the development and evaluation of alternatives. Conclusions: We ask readers to consider these concerns, perspectives, and ideas.

    Impact and Reach

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    236Downloads
    6 month trend
    62Hits

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

    Altmetric

    Repository staff only

    Edit record Edit record