A feasibility pilot study of the effects of neurostimulation on swallowing function in Parkinson’s Disease [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]

Sasegbon, Ayodele, Hammerbeck, Ulrike ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2657-4347, Michou, Emilia, Cheng, Ivy, Zhang, Mengqing, James, Charlotte and Hamdy, Shaheen (2022) A feasibility pilot study of the effects of neurostimulation on swallowing function in Parkinson’s Disease [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations, 1 not approved]. AMRC Open Research, 3 (19). ISSN 2517-6900

Preview

Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: Dysphagia often occurs during Parkinson’s disease (PD) and can have severe consequences. Recently, neuromodulatory techniques have been used to treat neurogenic dysphagia. Here we aimed to compare the neurophysiological and swallowing effects of three different types of neurostimulation, 5 Hertz (Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), 1 Hz rTMS and pharyngeal electrical stimulation (PES) in patients with PD. Method: 12 PD patients with dysphagia were randomised to receive either 5 Hz rTMS, 1 Hz rTMS, or PES. In a cross-over design, patients were assigned to one intervention and received both real and sham stimulation. Patients received a baseline videofluoroscopic (VFS) assessment of their swallowing, enabling penetration aspiration scores (PAS) to be calculated for: thin fluids, paste, solids and cup drinking. Swallowing timing measurements were also performed on thin fluid swallows only. They then had baseline recordings of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from both pharyngeal and (as a control) abductor pollicis brevis (APB) cortical areas using single-pulse TMS. Subsequently, the intervention was administered and post interventional TMS recordings were taken at 0 and 30 minutes followed by a repeat VFS within 60 minutes of intervention. Results: All interventions were well tolerated. Due to lower than expected recruitment, statistical analysis of the data was not undertaken. However, with respect to PAS swallowing timings and MEP amplitudes, there was small but visible difference in the outcomes between active and sham. Conclusion: PES, 5 Hz rTMS and 1 Hz rTMS are tolerable interventions in PD related dysphagia. Due to small patient numbers no definitive conclusions could be drawn from the data with respect to individual interventions improving swallowing function and comparative effectiveness between interventions. Larger future studies are needed to further explore the efficacy of these neuromodulatory treatments in Parkinson’s Disease associated dysphagia.