e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    Myths about Myths? A Commentary on Thomas (2020) and the Question of Jury Rape Myth Acceptance

    Daly, Ellen, Smith, Olivia, Bows, Hannah, Brown, Jennifer, Chalmers, James, Cowan, Sharon, Horvath, Miranda, Leverick, Fiona, Lovett, Jo, Munro, Vanessa and Willmott, Dominic ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7449-6462 (2022) Myths about Myths? A Commentary on Thomas (2020) and the Question of Jury Rape Myth Acceptance. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 7 (1). pp. 189-200. ISSN 2398-6808

    [img]
    Preview
    Accepted Version
    Download (651kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    This commentary responds to claims that research by Cheryl Thomas ‘shows’ no problem with rape myths in English and Welsh juries. We critique the claim on the basis of ambiguous survey design, a false distinction between ‘real’ jurors and other research participants, the conflation of attitudes in relation to abstract versus applied rape myths, and misleading interpretation of the data. Ultimately, we call for a balanced appraisal of individual studies by contextualising them against the wider literature.

    Impact and Reach

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    169Downloads
    6 month trend
    181Hits

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

    Altmetric

    Repository staff only

    Edit record Edit record