Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    ‘To us it’s still Boundary Park’: fan discourses on the corporate (re)naming of football stadia

    Gillooly, Leah ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1320-2803, Medway, Dominic ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6102-1716, Warnaby, Gary ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6696-6671 and Roper, Stuart (2022) ‘To us it’s still Boundary Park’: fan discourses on the corporate (re)naming of football stadia. Social and Cultural Geography, 23 (9). pp. 1275-1293. ISSN 1464-9365

    Published Version
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

    Download (691kB) | Preview


    This paper explores how the corporate (re)naming of football stadia and their urban environs is negotiated through fans’ toponymic discourses and associated commemoration. Critical toponymy research emphasises oppositional toponymic tensions between sovereign authorities and citizens, which can result in competing inscriptions of space. Adopting a quasi-ethnographic approach, we reveal a more complex picture by exploring the variegated toponymic discourses of football fans. The findings demonstrate intricate entanglements in how fans reluctantly accept a corporate stadium name, yet also actively resist it through counter-performative utterances, often imbued with commemorative intent. Alternatively, fans passively ignore a corporate stadium name, using a former toponym in quotidian and habitual speech. We conclude by considering the implications of these findings for the influence of corporate power in urban toponymic inscription.

    Impact and Reach


    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    6 month trend

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.


    Repository staff only

    Edit record Edit record