e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

Slurs, insults, (backhanded) compliments and other strategic facework moves

Archer, D (2015) Slurs, insults, (backhanded) compliments and other strategic facework moves. Language Sciences, 52. pp. 82-97. ISSN 0388-0001

[img]
Preview

Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (906kB) | Preview

Abstract

© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Slurs such as nigger tend to function as "disparaging remarks": that is, they are an attempt by speakers (S) to deliberately deprecate a target - or targets (T) - in some way (. Croom, 2011). Accordingly, they can be seen to share the same pragmatic space as other verbally aggressive acts such as insults, put-downs, snubs and backhanded compliments (Jucker and Taavitsainen, 2000). Mention of backhanded compliments, in turn, serves as a useful reminder that compliments can be seen as representing the positive end of a larger pragmatic space relating to the speaker's evaluation of the addressee, with slurs and insults representing the negative end (Taavitsainen and Jucker, 2008) and back-handed compliments, a positive/negative blend. In this paper, I introduce a facework scale that serves to capture face-enhancing and face-threatening strategies (and combinations thereof). It can thus explain various uses of terms such as nigger: for example, its use in order to slur or negatively frame another (Croom, 2011); its use (by in-group members) to express affection for or approval of another (Smitherman, 2006); and unsuccessful cases of (re-)appropriation (Bianchi, 2014) such that an utterance meant to build camaraderie between S and T ultimately serves to offend T. The facework scale can also explain additional facework moves, such as S's use of strategic facework strategies which afford them some plausibility deniability (Archer, 2011; Leech, 1983). Although paradigmatic slurs are not likely to be (strategically) denied by S, given their overt use in insulting, injuring, threatening the face of, or otherwise imposing a negative identity on T (Croom, 2013: 178), facework which is strategically ambivalent in some way(s) can be an effective means of S manipulating others' views of T without explicitly "doing" impoliteness (Archer, 2011). This work thus contributes to the field of im/politeness research as well as to the growing body of (pragmatic) research focussing on slurs.

Impact and Reach

Statistics

Downloads
Activity Overview
12Downloads
7Hits

Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

Altmetric

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item