Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    New Game, Old Rules? Mechanisms and Consequences of Legitimation in Boundary Spanning Activities

    Kislov, R ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2525-7673, Hyde, P and McDonald, R (2017) New Game, Old Rules? Mechanisms and Consequences of Legitimation in Boundary Spanning Activities. Organization Studies, 38 (10). pp. 1421-1444. ISSN 0170-8406

    Published Version
    Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

    Download (721kB) | Preview


    Despite the increasing deployment of formalized boundary spanning roles and practices, the mechanisms and dynamics of their legitimation remain under-explored. Using the Bourdieusian lens, we theorize legitimation of boundary spanning as accumulation, mobilization and conversion of several forms of capital unfolding in a configuration of intersecting fields. Drawing on a qualitative longitudinal case study of a collaborative partnership between a university and healthcare organizations, we describe changes in the structure, sources and mutual convertibility of capital assets over time. We also analyse the implications of this evolution for the relationships between the intersecting fields and the social trajectory of boundary spanners. We argue that legitimation of boundary spanning roles and practices is a highly transformative, collective and political process that increases the capital endowments and authority of individual boundary spanning agents but may lead to the erosion of the very same roles and practices that were being legitimized.

    Impact and Reach


    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    6 month trend

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.


    Repository staff only

    Edit record Edit record