e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

    Misperception of chance, conjunction, framing effects and belief in the paranormal: a further evaluation

    Dagnall, Neil ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0657-7604, Drinkwater, Kenneth ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4015-0578, Denovan, Andrew ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9082-7225, Parker, Andrew ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-7339 and Rowley, Kevin (2016) Misperception of chance, conjunction, framing effects and belief in the paranormal: a further evaluation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30 (3). pp. 409-419. ISSN 0888-4080

    [img]
    Preview
    Accepted Version
    Available under License In Copyright.

    Download (529kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Studies exploring relationships between belief in the paranormal and vulnerability to cognitive bias suggest thatbelievers are liable to misperception of chance and conjunction fallacy. Research investigating misperception of chance has pro-duced consistent findings, whilst work on conjunction fallacy is less compelling. Evidence indicates also that framing biases withina paranormal context can increase believers’ susceptibility. The present study, using confirmatory factor analysis and structuralequation modelling, examined the contribution of each bias to belief in the paranormal and assessed the merits of previousresearch. Alongside, the Revised Paranormal Belief Scale, participants completed standard and paranormal framed perceptionof randomness and conjunction problems. Perception of randomness was more strongly associated with belief in the paranormalthan conjunction fallacy. Inherent methodological issues limited the usefulness of framing manipulations; presenting problemswithin a paranormal context weakened their predictive power. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Impact and Reach

    Statistics

    Activity Overview
    6 month trend
    682Downloads
    6 month trend
    365Hits

    Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

    Altmetric

    Repository staff only

    Edit record Edit record