e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

‘It's good to talk’ – judicial allocation decision making and the Family Court

Potter, Ann and Newton, Kathryn and McLaughlin, Hugh (2015) ‘It's good to talk’ – judicial allocation decision making and the Family Court. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 37 (2). pp. 180-193. ISSN 0964-9069

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview

Download (688kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article focuses on the opportunities and potential benefits of collaborative judicial working and social processes within the new Family Court. To illustrate this, findings from a recent evaluation by the authors of the Greater Manchester Gatekeeping and Allocation – Care Proceedings Pilot (the Manchester Pilot) will be presented. In the Manchester Pilot, the allocation of care cases to a particular level of court became a collaborative judicial decision, to be achieved through consensual decision making. The social processes of face-to-face communication, negotiation, knowing and learning from each other in this new procedure, provide the main area of analysis in this article. Findings from our evaluation illustrate issues and opportunities for the lower courts under the new allocation arrangements within the Family Court, and may in some respects reflect aspects of other research of social processes such as Paterson's studies in the appellate courts.

Impact and Reach

Statistics

Downloads
Activity Overview
36Downloads
105Hits

Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

Altmetric

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item