e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

Gentrification 'research' and the academic nobility: a different class?

Allen, Christopher (2008) Gentrification 'research' and the academic nobility: a different class? International journal of urban and regional research, 32 (1). 180 - 185. ISSN 1468-2427

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This essay is a response to Tom Slater's article 'The eviction of critical perspectives from gentrification research'. My essay addresses two issues. First, I consider the issue of why gentrification research appears to be losing its critical edge. I argue that social position infects understanding and, inevitably therefore, academic knowledge production. Thus the social proximity of the academic nobility to gentrifiers (and social distance between the academic nobility and the displaced) has epistemological consequences, notably, the lack of critical perspectives in gentrification research. Second, Slater's paper appears to be an appeal for more 'critical' research from the academic nobility. Perhaps we should go even further. We should actually question the epistemic authority of the academic nobility, which claims its legitimacy to speak about gentrification on the grounds that it undertakes 'research' into the phenomenon. There are strong and sound epistemological reasons for also listening to the marginalized voices of people that have 'first hand' (albeit not 'research') experience of the negative effects of gentrification.

Impact and Reach

Statistics

Downloads
Activity Overview
0Downloads
86Hits

Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

Altmetric

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item