Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

Field methods for sampling tree height for tropical forest biomass estimation

Sullivan, MJP and Lewis, SL and Hubau, W and Qie, L and Baker, TR and Banin, LF and Chave, J and Cuni-Sanchez, A and Feldpausch, TR and Lopez-Gonzalez, G and Arets, E and Ashton, P and Bastin, JF and Berry, NJ and Bogaert, J and Boot, R and Brearley, FQ and Brienen, R and Burslem, DFRP and de Canniere, C and Chudomelová, M and Dančák, M and Ewango, C and Hédl, R and Lloyd, J and Makana, JR and Malhi, Y and Marimon, BS and Junior, BHM and Metali, F and Moore, S and Nagy, L and Vargas, PN and Pendry, CA and Ramírez-Angulo, H and Reitsma, J and Rutishauser, E and Salim, KA and Sonké, B and Sukri, RS and Sunderland, T and Svátek, M and Umunay, PM and Martinez, RV and Vernimmen, RRE and Torre, EV and Vleminckx, J and Vos, V and Phillips, OL (2018) Field methods for sampling tree height for tropical forest biomass estimation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9 (5). pp. 1179-1189. ISSN 2041-210X


Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (909kB) | Preview


© 2018 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. Quantifying the relationship between tree diameter and height is a key component of efforts to estimate biomass and carbon stocks in tropical forests. Although substantial site-to-site variation in height–diameter allometries has been documented, the time consuming nature of measuring all tree heights in an inventory plot means that most studies do not include height, or else use generic pan-tropical or regional allometric equations to estimate height. Using a pan-tropical dataset of 73 plots where at least 150 trees had in-field ground-based height measurements, we examined how the number of trees sampled affects the performance of locally derived height–diameter allometries, and evaluated the performance of different methods for sampling trees for height measurement. Using cross-validation, we found that allometries constructed with just 20 locally measured values could often predict tree height with lower error than regional or climate-based allometries (mean reduction in prediction error = 0.46 m). The predictive performance of locally derived allometries improved with sample size, but with diminishing returns in performance gains when more than 40 trees were sampled. Estimates of stand-level biomass produced using local allometries to estimate tree height show no over- or under-estimation bias when compared with biomass estimates using field measured heights. We evaluated five strategies to sample trees for height measurement, and found that sampling strategies that included measuring the heights of the ten largest diameter trees in a plot outperformed (in terms of resulting in local height–diameter models with low height prediction error) entirely random or diameter size-class stratified approaches. Our results indicate that even limited sampling of heights can be used to refine height–diameter allometries. We recommend aiming for a conservative threshold of sampling 50 trees per location for height measurement, and including the ten trees with the largest diameter in this sample.

Impact and Reach


Activity Overview

Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.


Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item