e-space
Manchester Metropolitan University's Research Repository

Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid: Single biomarker re-derivation and external validation in three cohorts

Body, R and Carlton, E and Sperrin, M and Lewis, PS and Burrows, G and Carley, S and McDowell, Garry and Buchan, I and Greaves, K and Mackway-Jones, K (2016) Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid: Single biomarker re-derivation and external validation in three cohorts. Emergency Medicine Journal, 34. pp. 349-356. ISSN 1472-0205

[img]
Preview

Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (645kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://emj.bmj.com/

Abstract

Background The original Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes model (MACS) 'rules in' and 'rules out' acute coronary syndromes (ACS) using high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) measured at admission. The latter is not always available. We aimed to refine and validate MACS as Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS), cutting down the biomarkers to just hs-cTnT. Methods We present secondary analyses from four prospective diagnostic cohort studies including patients presenting to the ED with suspected ACS. Data were collected and hs-cTnT measured on arrival. The primary outcome was ACS, defined as prevalent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or incident death, AMI or coronary revascularisation within 30 days. T-MACS was built in one cohort (derivation set) and validated in three external cohorts (validation set). Results At the 'rule out' threshold, in the derivation set (n=703), T-MACS had 99.3% (95% CI 97.3% to 99.9%) negative predictive value (NPV) and 98.7% (95.3%-99.8%) sensitivity for ACS, 'ruling out' 37.7% patients (specificity 47.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) 34.0%). In the validation set (n=1459), T-MACS had 99.3% (98.3%-99.8%) NPV and 98.1% (95.2%- 99.5%) sensitivity, 'ruling out' 40.4% (n=590) patients (specificity 47.0%, PPV 23.9%). T-MACS would 'rule in' 10.1% and 4.7% patients in the respective sets, of which 100.0% and 91.3% had ACS. C-statistics for the original and refined rules were similar (T-MACS 0.91 vs MACS 0.90 on validation). Conclusions T-MACS could 'rule out' ACS in 40% of patients, while 'ruling in' 5% at highest risk using a single hs-cTnT measurement on arrival. As a clinical decision aid, T-MACS could therefore help to conserve healthcare resources.

Impact and Reach

Statistics

Downloads
Activity Overview
127Downloads
108Hits

Additional statistics for this dataset are available via IRStats2.

Altmetric

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item